There was a pretty interesting debate going on over at
The New York Times
yesterday. Elizabeth Semmelhack, a bona fide shoe expert, wrote out some brief thoughts on whether or not stilettos can be empowering for women. It's a valid question. As she notes, the issue today is basically divided into two perceptions of what a woman in heels represents: A vaguely '80s, Grace-Jones-inspired vision of "power sexy," which includes stilettos but also lots of badass activity; and the more Betty-Draper-ish way of wearing high heels, in which they are more of a trap-enforcing delicacy and convey the old trope of women as "ornamental" instead of "instrumental." Today, of course, it's all about choice, as it should be. If you personally feel that stilettos are steeped in a long history of patriarchy that can only be undone by erasing its symbols completely, then wear flats, and more power to you. If you love stilettos and you refuse to let age-old sexism get in the way of your right to own a pair of bangin' shoes, well, girl, work it. It's that simple, right?
AdvertisementADVERTISEMENT