Forgive me a tweet spasm on the final convention night. A few, at least.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
1. Conventions have a specific purpose: to sell or redefine.
2. To the extent that people watched, there was tons of testimony from people about HRC's good deeds/warmth, that helps redefinition
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
3. Tons of time was spent emphasizing Donald Trump, and what speakers from Obama on down see as the threat he poses to America.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
4. That went beyond the usual criticism to ground-floor level impact he would have on democracy, in their view, imperiling it.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
5. The question now is whether Trump and Clinton are so well known that no further definition, for good or bad, will stick.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
6. Hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent on ads. Will we still have at the end two highly unpopular candidates, a coin flip?
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
7. Or will one candidate have dramatically reshaped his/her image over the course of the four days each spent in convention hoo-haw.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
8. Some observations: This was Clinton's best big speech. Well written and delivered well. Akin to challenge/execution by GHW Bush in 1988.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
9. Both Bush and Clinton were seeking office after two terms of a popular same-party president who'd overshadowed them. Both delivered.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
10. In Bush's case, his success at the convention speech improved his future speechmaking/communication. Will this do the same for Clinton?
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
11. Other observations: Staging of Clinton's convention speech was lush. Flags of different sizes, signs, color scheme all worked together
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
12. People can laugh at things like that but they translate in voters' minds. Staging at GOP convention felt more haphazard; speakers too.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
13 The theatrics of it all won't matter in a blow-out. But they can matter in a close race. After this year, is anyone betting against that?
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
14. Viewers of all convention hours saw tons of people testifying for Clinton or against Trump. You can bet the ads have already been cut.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
15. That brings up another Clinton advantage: A team that has done this before. Crispness, efficiency, knowing where to get voters, helps.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
16. Tonight also was something of a Sista Soulja night for Dems: Army general/military endorsing HRC, gun control a big part of her speech.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
17. Also worth noting: Chelsea Clinton + other speakers offered reams of personal anecdotes about Hillary. Not even Trump's kids did much.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
18. Personal anecdotes may not matter; the combo of anti-Clinton and economy woes may negate. Just like no minds may change on Trump.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
19. But re the conventions, Clinton helped herself on a personal level. On a policy level, too little talk of the economy, seems to me.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016
20. And Trump had a rocky convention and has worked to obliterate any gains with his talk about Russia and continued belligerence.
— Cathleen Decker (@cathleendecker) July 29, 2016